世界针灸学会联合会

Penetration needling on complementary acupoints for insomnia * 相对穴透刺治疗失眠症疗效观察 *

作者:孙梦晓 来源:本站原创 点击:808次 更新:1523866894

  <p>YIN Yuan (殷&nbsp; 媛)<sup>1</sup>,&nbsp; &nbsp;ZHANG Ya-ping (张亚平)<sup>2</sup>,&nbsp; &nbsp;YANG Zhi-xin (杨志新)<sup>1</sup> , LI Jiao-ying (李姣莹)<sup>1</sup></p><p><br/></p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. Chengde Medical University, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, China; 2. Baoding First Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China</p><p style="text-align: justify;">(1. 承德医学院中医学院,河北承德 067000,中国;2. 保定市第一中医院,河北保定 071000)</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Objective&nbsp; </strong>To observe the comparison of the clinical efficacy between penetration needling from Nèiguān (内关 PC 6) to Wàiguān (外关 TE 5) and western medicine estazolam for insomnia. <strong>Methods</strong>&nbsp; Sixty insomnia patients were divided into 2 groups according to the random number table, 30 cases in each group. Penetration needling from PC 6 to TE 5 was mainly adopted in acupuncture&nbsp; group for once a day, 5 times a week, and treatment for 4 weeks was 1 course of treatment. Estazolam was orally given in medicine group before sleep every night in a dosage of 1 mg per time, and treatment for 4 weeks was 1 course of treatment. After 4 weeks, the clinical efficacy and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score were compared respectively between the two groups. <strong>Results&nbsp;</strong> The total effective rate was 90.00% in acupuncture group and 63.33% in medicine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P﹤0.05). PSQI score in acupuncture group was (7.93±3.77) , which was superior to that in medicine group (10.60±4.20), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P﹤0.05). <strong>Conclusion&nbsp;</strong> The penetration needling of complementary acupoints from PC 6 to TE 5 was simple and convenient which can significantly improve the patients’ sleep quality.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>KEY WORDS</strong>: Complementary acupoints; penetration needling; Nèiguān (内关 PC 6); Wàiguān (外关 TE 5); insomnia</p><p style="text-align: justify;">ABSTRACT IN CHINESE</p><p style="text-align: justify;">[摘 要] 目的:观察相对穴内关透外关为主治疗失眠症,与西药艾司唑仑的临床疗效差异。方法:将60例失眠患者根据随机数字表分成2组。治疗组30例应用相对穴内关透外关为主治疗,每日1次,每周5次,4周为1个疗程。对照组30例予以艾司唑仑片治疗,每次1mg,每晚睡前口服,4周为1疗程。4周后对比观察两组的临床疗效及匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分。结果:总有效率治疗组90.00%,对照组63.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组PSQI评分为(7.93±3.77)分,优于对照组的(10.60±4.20)分,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相对穴内关透外关配穴简便,可明显改善患者的睡眠质量。</p><p>[关键词] 相对穴 透刺 内关 外关 失眠</p><p><br/></p>

期刊导读